Novelist Michael Crichton, author of Jurassic Park, Westworld, Sphere, and other novels, once observed that “Once you abandon strict adherence to what science tells us, once you start arranging the truth in a press conference, then anything is possible.”
Here is the Crichton Conundrum: If people are against something, then any theory is correct that supports their beliefs, even when the science is total bunkum.
Here is the Crichton Conundrum: If people are against something, then any theory is correct that supports their beliefs, even when the science is total bunkum. Click To Tweet
Examples of the Crichton Conundrum can be found in many places:
The $15 minimum wage is promoted as a living wage, yet the result is that 10 to 20% of low-wage workers lose their jobs and have no living wage, no wage at all.
Net neutrality is a false promise that ends in higher prices or lower service or both.
Natural forest management ends in raging fires in California, New Mexico, Arizona, and other western states.
Free or price-controlled goods and services end up causing shortages of the controlled goods. Free college, free medical care, free child care—all will end up creating poorer and poorer services.
Crichton called for people to question the validity any science, data, or studies promulgated by true believers—to argue outside the restriction of any box people try to put ideas into.
In a recent article in the Wall Street Journal, Andy Kessler asked, “Why doesn’t anyone make the case for free markets? Because it doesn’t lend itself to easy sound bites; e.g.: What do you mean millions of people make billions of price decisions every day that efficiently allocates capital?”
According to Kessler, “Crichton would have a field day today: democratic socialism, implicit bias, medical marijuana, open curriculum, small class sizes, surveillance capitalism, HOV lanes, electric-vehicle credits, renewable-fuel standards, carbon taxes—it never ends. We’re sorely missing the other side of the argument.”